A couple of weeks back, we posted Medicare Health Insurance Choices that explained the differences and pitfalls between traditional Medicare Part A and B plus Medigap insurance plans to Part C, Medicare Advantage. Click the link earlier in the previous sentence if you missed it.
As many already know, there is a Part D that covers drug costs. It is either purchased as a separate plan or rolled into Part C Advantage. Drug coverage is significantly changing this year, and AnCan has learnt that many of our participants are not yet aware. Hardly surprising because CMS as well as the various stakeholders like Payers and providers have done very little to let us patients know. Why should they? – we’re only the ultimate consumer!
The same cannot be said of JnJ who started educating patient advocate organizations this past May. In October and November JnJ created more education that includes a webinar and a round table coming up hosted by NAMAPA, the National Association for Medication Access and Patient Advocacy. Likely you have never heard of them. I hadn’t and it hardly rolls off the tongue. Nonetheless, the webinar was very instructive and you can watch it here.
The BIG difference for us patients is that no matter what, out-of-pocket drug costs for 2025 cannot exceed $2000. You heard right – for those of you on specialty oral medications like Nubeqa (darolutamide for prostate cancer) or Aubagio (teriflunomide for MS), normally sourced via specialty pharmacies, you will meet this cap January. And you’ll even be able to spread the payment over 12 months! More on that to follow.
But first, how is this coming about. Well it tracks back tot he changes brought about by the Inflation Reduction Act signed by President Biden in 2022. He promised to make drugs more affordable, and this is a part of the plan. As you can see in the slide to the left comparing 2024 to 2025, the donut hole has been eliminated. In its place, the Payer (Plan Sponsor) and Pharma (manufacturer) are paying more. While the cost saving is very positive, it will likely impact us patients in other ways:
Your formulary choice may be reduced – so CHECK your medications before you renew.
Premiums for Part D may increase – even though out of pocket is capped. If you are unlikely to spend $2,000, look for a plan that defers your co-pay as long as possible
Higher premium plans should cover a larger portion of drug costs earlier. Your premium does NOT count towards the $2,000, so include premiums in your cost calculation to figure your exposure.
If you have a co-pay or co-insurance on your drugs, no matter if it’s Part C or D, it cannot exceed $2,000. However the amount you pay and who you pay it to may become a bit of a moving target. We mentioned earlier that you will now have the opportunity to spread your payments over the calendar year – or the remainder of it, if you sign up late or incur costs late in the year. The Medicare Prescription Payment Plan (M3P) takes your share of drug costs, up to a maximum of $2,000, and spreads them over the remainder of the year.
The simple example is for those on specialty pharmaceutical drugs like Nubeqa or Aubagio. Since your share of the drug cost is almost certainly going to be greater than $2,000 in January, if you opt in for M3P BEFORE going to the pharmacy or ordering from your mail order pharmacy, you’ll pay nothing on picking up/shipping the drugs. Subsequently, you’ll get a separate bill from your Payer for $167.67 monthly over 12 months, and pay no more for any of your drugs the rest of the year. There is NO interest, no late fee penalties, and you get a couple of months leeway, but there are penalties if you never pay. You can sign up for MP3 with your Medicare Payer/Plan Holder BUT not in the pharmacy for 2025. So if you arrive at the drug store prior to enrollment, you’ll be charged $2,000 to take your pills home. You can leave the pills, go home, enroll and return to the pharmacy 24 hours later and pick up without payment to the pharmacy..
If you don’t start this expensive drug until mid year, say September, and you’ve spent nothing on drugs prior, then the $2,000 is billed over the last 4 months at $500/month.
But what if your drug costs are more lumpy – they go up and down the whole year. In that case, the payments get recalculated each month and the monthly bill will vary.
There is a strange case too, if you know your co-pay is the same each month – say $55. This really throws M3P, and as you can see to the left, you’ll pay the same $660 (12x $55) either way but in different amounts each month if enrolled in M3P.
Finally, let’s address the Drug Benefit plans that many of you enjoy through PAN, PAF and others. Even the drug discount cards from Pharma that some receive. Whatever you receive, or however you receive it, does NOT reduce your $2,000 exposure. You advise the pharmacy that you have a benefit, and they bill the Benefit Provider (PAN, PAF, Pharma ??). The credit will be applied against your drug cost, although eventually you may still be liable for up to $2,000 co-pay when the benefit runs out.
Looking at the first slide, it seems to AnCan that these benefits that are often funded by Pharma, eventually flow back to Pharma and the Payer. How they will credit them against what the patient owes is not yet clear. Before you get too crazed, our guess is the system has to change. These benefits need to be channeled directly to patients who cannot afford $2,000 p.a. AnCan is on it and already reaching out to NAMAPA and others to promote more of a direct, income based subsidy possibly reaching more beneficiaries. One thing we have heard – APPLY EARLY for 2025 in the event you are in line to receive a subsidy.
PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN UP FOR THE M3P PROGRAM UPFRONT. EVEN IF YOU OWE $2,000 IT WILL BE BILLED IN 12 INSTALLMENTS. WE STILLL HAVE TO FIGURE HOW YOU WILL BE REIMBURSED IF YOU RECEIVE ASSISTANCE.
IF YOU HAVE A GRANT BE SURE TO PROVIDE DETALS TO THE PHARMACY ASAP. NOTWITHSTANDING, ALSO REACH OUT TO YOUR GRANTOR TO FIND HOW THEY WANT TO COORDINATE THE GRANT. IT’S STILLL A MOVING TARGET!
With Open Enrollment starting on October 15, two AnCan’rs asked for advice this week on Medicare plans – and yes it’s complicated. AnCan recommends you watch the webinar we held last October to help understand the difference between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. The dollar details are different for 2025 but not the principles.
Lastly, my own health insurance broker, Kim Umphres, is licensed to write in 15 States. He offered his help to all in last year’s webinar, so take him up umphres100@yahoo.com
Since the same questions are likely in the mind of many others, I have written this Blog Post. I am no expert but this may illustrate how I think about my own health insurance. Sadly, I cannot help you all individually – consult with your own Medicare health insurance for the best advice.
Onward & upwards, rick
Many of us on Medicare are faced with renewing our plans – or buying a plan for the first time. If you choose not to buy a plan to supplement Medicare, it leaves you exposed to roughly 20% of your medical costs. That can amount to very big bucks!
The main choice is whether to opt for Traditional Medicare + a Supplement (Medigap) Plan + a Drug Plan. Alternatively, a Medicare Advantage Plan can look attractive but comes with warts.
If you are low income and cannot afford the available plans, there are Medicaid alternatives for Medicare supplements.
Advantage Plans (Plan C) restrict your choice of Health Care Providers since they are based on Provider Networks. If you need a particular type of specialist, for example a genitourinary medical oncologist, or a neurologist who specializes in MS, this can be a problem with Advantage. Community Standard of Care is often the byword. If you choose an Advantage Plan, be sure it covers HCPs who practice at a Center of Excellence.
Advantage Plans usually have small monthly premiums, sometimes zero. They also include co-pays when you visit a Provider. Co-pays can be anywhere from Zero dollars to several hundred for fancy scans like PSMA, so you have to look carefully at the coverage. The more you use the plan, the more you pay. Some may include coinsurance – avoid those altogether. It’s a nuance we won’t get into here.
You can also go out of network to a Provider of your choice, but copays will be significantly higher. For example, you may pay $50 for a visit to a specialist in-network. Out-of-network, the cost can be significantly higher – often 40% of the approved Medicare fee for the service sought.
Advantage Plans often have a Gatekeeper who must approve any referral. You may not be able to self refer. Also there can be stricter intervention by the Plan to pre-approve procedures.
Drugs are included, however there is also a co-pay for some generic and all branded drugs that depends on the tier in which they are classified in the Plan’s drug formulary. List the drugs you use and find the cost. That said, the good news in 2025 is that drug out-of-pocket costs cannot exceed $2,000.
Traditional Medicare with a Supplement (Plans F,G,K,L,M,N) may not restrict your choice of HCPs – you can go anywhere in or out of state provided the Provider accepts Medicare.
Traditional Medicare Supplement Plans cover the 20% not covered by Medicare A and B. You pay a monthly premium that varies according to the plan chosen. The different supplement plans have different features. The more you pay in monthly premium, the less the restrictions and the lower the deductibles.
In addition you will need drug coverage (Plan D). Again that includes a monthly premium, plus a charge for each drug, so you have to shop plans against your Rx. For 2025, drug out-of-pocket costs cannot exceed $2,000.
As long as your chosen Provider accepts self-referrals, there may be no Gatekeeper. Procedures and protocols may still be subject to pre-approval.
Since Advantage Plans can be more profitable for the Payer, they offer lots of bells and whistles to sell the plan – for example subsidies for OTC products. One plan I was offered recently, actually pays the Holder $5/month!
I’m trained as an economist so I look at risk reward. I compare the annual maximum out-of-pocket cost between the Advantage Plan and the Traditional Medicare Plans (inc. the drug plan).
For traditional Medicare There is a required monthly premium for both the Supplement and the Drug Plan. Add those together and multiply by 12. In addition you can have out-of-pocket drug costs, especially if you are using expensive cancer drugs, but that cannot exceed $2,000 in 2025. Btw, the $2000 will decrease in subsequent years.
Each Advantage Plan has a stipulated maximum out-of-pocket cost for in-network and out-of-network Providers. In-network will be less. I look at the out-of-network max, and add to that any monthly premiums that are usually minimal. Drugs are included with a co-pay, but that co-pay cannot exceed $2,000 in 2025.
Now that I know what I HAVE to pay with Traditional + Supplement vs what I could pay with Advantage depending on my usage, I can compare whether I want to roll the dice to save money.
If the Traditional route costs me $500 in monthly premiums, I know I am out-of-pocket $6,000 plus my drug copay costs capped at $2,000.
Say my Advantage Plan has a monthly premium of $25, then for sure I am out of pocket $300. The rest depends on how much medical care I use. Assume ( the economist’s favorite word) the out-of-pocket for out-of-network in my plan is $8,000, that is my max. I still have to consider up to $2,000 for drugs.
Let’s compare!
IN THE WORST CASE I am spending $6,000 (+ drugs) for Traditional Supplement versus $8,300 (+ drugs) for Advantage. The Advantage could be $2,300 more pricey.
IN THE BEST CASE, I am out-of-pocket $300 (+ drugs) for Advantage vs $6,000 (+ drugs) for Traditional Supplement, so I could save $5,700 with Advantage.
Risk-Reward… do I want to roll the dice to save up to $5,700 that could cost me an extra $2,300??
Each person has to make that decision.
There’s more to it than this. For example HMO’s like Kaiser Permanente may make it even harder to go out of network. And with KP, you are guarantied to only get community Standard of Care medicine . As I often say, KP is great as long as you don’t get seriously ill.
AnCan strongly suggests finding a local Medicare Health Insurance Agent to help you sort through this morass. Plans change by State, so your agent must be licensed in your State.
And one last thing. The first time you enter Medicare there is NO underwriting. No matter your preconditions, you are accepted to any Traditional supplement or Advantage Plan. In subsequent years, you may be subject to underwriting should you choose to switch plans. You can be restricted from changing between an Advantage and Traditional Supplement Plan.
AnCan recommends watching our webinar from last October to help understand the difference between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. 2025 details are different but not the principles.
We also recommend you visit the Triage website and attend its free webinars. Many of their Medicare resources can be found at https://triagecancer.org/medicare-cancer
For differences between the Traditional Supplement Plans, consult with a specialized Medicare Health Insurance agent. F and G are the best options. There are also high deductible options. An agent can also help you compare Advantage plans by various criteria, like maximum out-of-pocket for out-of-network care.
For men facing cancer treatment, the risk of infertility is a major concern that is often overlooked. While fertility preservation options exist, studies consistently show that a significant proportion of patients are not adequately informed or offered these choices by their healthcare providers before undergoing potentially sterilizing cancer treatments.
The main barriers to men being aware of fertility preservation include limited knowledge and training among providers, discomfort discussing the sensitive topic, low referral rates to reproductive specialists, logistical challenges, time constraints before treatment initiation, perceptions about appropriateness based on prognosis, and patient-related factors like lack of awareness and financial concerns.
It is crucial for men to understand their options for preserving fertility, which include:
Sperm Cryopreservation (Sperm Banking)
This standard and most effective method involves collecting and freezing sperm samples before treatment for future use through assisted reproductive techniques like intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). It is well-established and successful for post-pubertal males.
Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation
An experimental approach where testicular tissue is removed and frozen before cancer treatment. The frozen tissue may potentially be used later to extract sperm stem cells for reimplantation or to induce in vitro spermatogenesis. However, no live births from this method have been reported in humans yet.
Gonadal Shielding
Protecting the testicles from radiation damage by using lead shields during radiotherapy. Its effectiveness is limited by patient anatomy and radiation field requirements.
Sperm Retrieval
For males who cannot produce a semen sample, sperm can be surgically retrieved from the testicles or epididymis through techniques like testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA). Retrieved sperm can then be used for IVF/ICSI. This invasive option is appropriate when a male cannot produce a semen sample due to conditions like anejaculation, obstructive azoospermia, or prior to puberty.
While sperm cryopreservation is the most established and successful fertility preservation method, sperm retrieval combined with IVF/ICSI can be an option when cryopreserved sperm is unavailable or inadequate. However, IVF/ICSI is more invasive, costly, and has lower success rates compared to using cryopreserved sperm for insemination.
Overcoming barriers to awareness and utilization of fertility preservation options requires improved education and adherence to clinical guidelines from organizations like the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Establishing formal fertility preservation programs with multidisciplinary teams, patient navigators, and educational initiatives can help ensure that men with cancer have the opportunity to make informed decisions about preserving their fertility before undergoing cancer treatments.
For questions, please contact Mark Perloe at mperloe@outlook.com
Are you ready to get the inside scoop on clinical trials? Get ready to delve deep with former clinical trial nurse coordinator Marni Tierno. We know it can be a complex and overwhelming topic, but don’t worry – we’re here to break it down in a way that’s easy to understand.
Also featuring the vast professional experience of Wendy Garvin Mayo, we’ll tackle the myths and misconceptions that often surround clinical trials, giving you the facts and insights you need to make informed decisions.
Whether you’re a patient, carepartner, or simply curious about clinical trials, this webinar is for you! Our aim is to empower you with a deep understanding, allowing you to make the best choices for yourself or your loved ones.
Some of the topics we will cover include:
Description of the types and phases of clinical trials
Examples of pivotal clinical trials that have changed how we treat cancer
What to expect when participating in a clinical trial (including potential risks and benefits)
Addressing common questions about clinical trial participation
and more!
Watch here: (closed captioning is provided for this webinar, click the CC button at the bottom next to the gear.)
To view the slides from this webinar, please click here.
Special thanks to Bayer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Foundation Medicine, Myriad Genetics, Telix, and Blue Earth Diagnostics for sponsoring this webinar.
And very special thanks to Illumina and Collaborative Cancer Care for letting us have two of their absolute best people present for us!
.
To SIGN UP for any of our Virtual Support groups, visit our Contact Us page.
Helpful Tips to be Your Own Best Medical Researcher
AnCan asked Mike Wyn, a valued AnCan Frequent Flyer and intrepid researcher, to provide a little navigation to those who are new to research… as well as useful tips for some old hands like myself. I’ve already gathered some research nuggets from Mike’s wisdom… thank you, Mr. W.
Here are a few tips ensure the medical information you are researching is reliable and accurate
Book Research
Check the publication date: authors may need at least a year to write a book, and the average time between a book’s acceptance and its publication is typically between 9 to 12 months. Hence, the data may already be outdated when it hits the shelves
Professional Presentations
Check the credentials, disclaimers, and disclosures of the presenters. Who is the author? What is the sponsoring organization providing the information? Preferred sources are from reputable institutions, such as universities, hospitals, or government health agencies.
Google Web Searches
Use command “site:” to limit you search to top-level domains like .gov, ,org and ,edu. For example, type: latest NCCN guidelines for prostate active surveillance site: .gov OR site: .org OR site: .edu
Be cautious with .com sites unless they are from recognized and credible entities. Medical databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar are good sources for cross-referencing scientific research.
Articles, Online Posts
Check articles, online posts, videos etc. for their sources, including scientific studies, medical journals, or clinical trials. Information from peer-reviewed journals is typically more reliable than content from non-peer-reviewed sources. Poor reviewed means that other people similarly qualified to the author have reviewed teh article adn provided comments.
Anecdotal Evidence
Anecdotal evidence is information that has been observed by the person reporting but not verified. Be skeptical of anecdotal evidence such as personal stories. It is not scientifically reliable. Focus on information supported by scientific evidence and clinical studies. The quality levels of evidence from highest to lowest for medical data are:
Systematic reviews: collect and evaluate all available data/evidence within the researchers’ criteria. An example is the “Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews”. Meta studies are a systematic review.
Randomized controlled trials: participants are randomly assigned to experimental and control arms. The double-blind trial is the gold-standard of medical research where neither the participants nor the researchers know the placebo or medication/treatment is given. This is to prevent bias and to ensure the validity and reliability of the study.
Cohort observational study: participants with common traits or exposure to the proposed medications or treatments are followed over a long period of time.
Case study or report: a detailed report of result after treatment of an individual. This is formalized and reviewed anecdotal evidence.
Medical Trial Reports
The phases of medical trial studies cited by published medical papers are:
Pre-clinical studies: laboratory experiments using cell cultures, animal or computer models. In vitro means tested In Vitro – literally ‘in glass’ means testing outside a living organism, in a test tube or petri dish, In Vivo – literally in life -means testing in a living organism, often mice. Then studies move on to humans…
Phase I trials: assess safety, dosage and side effects of the proposed medications or treatment.
Phase II trials: expand P 1 to evaluate efficacy of the proposed medications or treatment – how well it works..
Phase III trials: confirm efficacy, safety, dosage and to evaluate side effects of the proposed medications or treatment in much larger samples. This is often where randomized blind and double blind design is used. Blind means the patient does not know what they are getting; double blind means neither the patient nor the clinician know what is being dosed.
Phase IV trials: monitor long term effectiveness and safety of the medication or treatment.
Statistical Terms
Some terms regarding statistical data cited in medical journals are explained as follows:
N = the number of participants: be wary of studies with a very low N.
HR = hazard ratio: HR=1 – there is no change in the proposed medication/treatment compared to control baseline. HR<1 – there is a reduction of risks with the proposed medication/treatment. HR>1 – there is an increase risk with the proposed medication/treatment.
CI = Confidence Interval: A trial shows that a particular drug has a 20% effect within a certain time frame with 95% CI. This shows that the study, if repeated many times, it will be 95% confident that the 20% reduction will be consistently observed.
P-value = Probability Value: This measures how strong the evidence is that the hypothesis, or effect being tested, is correct, rather than the result being random, or incorrect (null hypothesis). We seek a P-value that is <=0.05 meaning that there is a 95% or better likelihood the result is attributable to what is being tested..
What’s in a Clinical Trial? – Dr. John Antonucci’s Primer
On Tuesday, February 27 a squadron of AnCan specialists attempted the impossible: to condense the essence of arguably the best scientific meeting on genitourinary cancer research in the world into 1 hour of intelligible, useful information. A couple of hundred scientific poster and oral research presentations from the American Society of Clinical Oncologists annual GU meeting (GU ASCO24), made available and understandable to us AnCan’rs? You can view their attempt as well as the slides at https://ancan.org/patient-highlights-from-the-2024-asco-gu-conference/ and judge how they managed.
To prepare for the session, a basic understanding of research is very helpful. It starts when scientists comes up with a question. For example, “Does Lupron do any good?” They then design a study to answer the question.
Types of studies:
Not every study is an experiment. In an experiment, the scientist does something to the subjects, such as try a new drug, and compare them to a control group, which doesn’t get manipulated. In observational research, the scientist studies the subjects but doesn’t do anything to them.
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are a type of experiment that are highly thought of. If you want to find out if Lupron is any good, you can find 2 groups of subjects with prostate cancer, give one group Lupron, and the other group a placebo (ie no medicine, although you still administer the fake dose). You have to be careful that the 2 groups match, because if you accidentally put most of the healthy patients in group A, they will do better but mess up your conclusion. This is the controlled part: you have to make sure both groups match except for the experimental manipulation. This is partly done by randomizing, assigning the subjects at random to the groups. At the end, you find out how long each group lived (or some other pre-established endpoint) and make a conclusion. This type of study is an experiment. It is also prospective: you create data as you go along which makes it a good study.
One of the several types of observational studies is the cohort study. Cohort studies follow groups to see how they do. For example, you could follow 1000 men over time, and see if the smokers get more prostate cancer than the nonsmokers. This could give a clue into what contributes to prostate cancer and how to prevent it. These studies are often prospective (looking into the future) but can also be look-back, or retrospective as well. A well-known cohort study in prostate cancer is the Canary Cohort that looks at low/intermediate Active Surveillance; or the Framingham Heart Cohort.
A cross-sectional study can answer questions like, what percentage of 50-year-old men have had a PSA test? You have 500 fifty year old men answer the question, and get your conclusion. It’s at one point in time. (The opposite is a longitudinal study, following subjects over time.)
Qualitative studies don’t collect numerical data like the others. If you want to find out what life is like on Lupron, you interview lots of men on the drug and get the big picture. The opposite is quantitative, where numerical data is collected.
Naturally, it makes sense to have lots of subjects in any study so you don’t get fooled by chance. For instance, you could flip a coin twice, get heads twice, and wrongly conclude that all coin flips will be heads. So big studies are better than small ones. The number of subjects in a study is known as n. Small ‘n’smake results suspect.
The chosen study type depends on the question, the ethics, and the resources. Only an experiment, like an RCT, can make a cause-and-effect conclusion, because it’s randomized and has a control group. Other studies can discover correlation; that’s when two phenomena occur together but causation is unclear.
There are studies of studies as well: A Meta-analysis will review and combine several similar studies to make the results even more convincing. A Literature review will review many studies, pick the best, and create a summary for us.
Basic science research uses instruments like petri dishes and microscopes to study molecules or cells or tissues; these are in-vitro studies. Lupron started in basic science research. Then it progressed to animal or in-vivo studies. Treatments that look promising at this stage progress to human clinical studies.
Clinical Trial Phases
You will hear human clinical studies presented as Phase I, Phase II, or Phase III studies. According to the FDA, Phase 1 has 20 to 100 healthy volunteers or people with the disease/condition. It lasts several months and is to test for safety and dosage. About70% of drugs move to the Phase 2, where up to several hundred people with the disease/condition are studied for several months to 2 years looking atefficacy and side effects. Approximately 33% of drugs move to phase 3, where 300 to 3,000 volunteers who have the disease or condition are studies for 1 to 4 years to deeply look at efficacy and monitoring of adverse reactions.
A drug like Lupron, when it did well at all these phases, was then submitted to the FDA for approval. After approval it was still followed, in phase IV or post-marketing research, as it was given to thousand of patients. Keep the phases in mind if you volunteer to be a research subject.
Clinical tests One last thing. How do you measure if a test is any good? What if someone asks, “Is PSA any good as a test for prostate cancer?” There are two key measures to consider: sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity asks, “If prostate cancer is present, how good is the test at detecting it?” This measures the test’s ability to identify those with the disease correctly. Specificity, on the other hand, asks, “If prostate cancer is absent, how good is the test at correctly identifying those without the disease?” This measures the test’s ability to identify those who don’t have the condition correctly. Both measures are crucial in evaluating the effectiveness of a diagnostic test.
Clinical tests can be either predictive–A predictive test is designed to predict the likelihood of a specific outcome or response to a particular treatment or intervention. –or prognostic–a prognostic test is used to estimate the likely course or outcome of a disease, regardless of treatment.
Your AnCan team looked at all those ASCO meeting presentations with an eye toward good study design, importance, whether it’s an experiment or not and if so what phase it is, is it prospective, does it have a large-n, and is it of interest to men in our group. Hopefully reading this will make it easier to understand the ramblings of our AnCan Mods.
and this is a part of the plan. As you can see in the slide to the left comparing 2024 to 2025, the donut hole has been eliminated. In its place, the Payer (Plan Sponsor) and Pharma (manufacturer) are paying more. While the cost saving is very positive, it will likely impact us patients in other ways:
But what if your drug costs are more lumpy – they go up and down the whole year. In that case, the payments get recalculated each month and the monthly bill will vary.
. 
