A couple of weeks back, we posted Medicare Health Insurance Choices that explained the differences and pitfalls between traditional Medicare Part A and B plus Medigap insurance plans to Part C, Medicare Advantage. Click the link earlier in the previous sentence if you missed it.
As many already know, there is a Part D that covers drug costs. It is either purchased as a separate plan or rolled into Part C Advantage. Drug coverage is significantly changing this year, and AnCan has learnt that many of our participants are not yet aware. Hardly surprising because CMS as well as the various stakeholders like Payers and providers have done very little to let us patients know. Why should they? – we’re only the ultimate consumer!
The same cannot be said of JnJ who started educating patient advocate organizations this past May. In October and November JnJ created more education that includes a webinar and a round table coming up hosted by NAMAPA, the National Association for Medication Access and Patient Advocacy. Likely you have never heard of them. I hadn’t and it hardly rolls off the tongue. Nonetheless, the webinar was very instructive and you can watch it here.
The BIG difference for us patients is that no matter what, out-of-pocket drug costs for 2025 cannot exceed $2000. You heard right – for those of you on specialty oral medications like Nubeqa (darolutamide for prostate cancer) or Aubagio (teriflunomide for MS), normally sourced via specialty pharmacies, you will meet this cap January. And you’ll even be able to spread the payment over 12 months! More on that to follow.
But first, how is this coming about. Well it tracks back tot he changes brought about by the Inflation Reduction Act signed by President Biden in 2022. He promised to make drugs more affordable, and this is a part of the plan. As you can see in the slide to the left comparing 2024 to 2025, the donut hole has been eliminated. In its place, the Payer (Plan Sponsor) and Pharma (manufacturer) are paying more. While the cost saving is very positive, it will likely impact us patients in other ways:
Your formulary choice may be reduced – so CHECK your medications before you renew.
Premiums for Part D may increase – even though out of pocket is capped. If you are unlikely to spend $2,000, look for a plan that defers your co-pay as long as possible
Higher premium plans should cover a larger portion of drug costs earlier. Your premium does NOT count towards the $2,000, so include premiums in your cost calculation to figure your exposure.
If you have a co-pay or co-insurance on your drugs, no matter if it’s Part C or D, it cannot exceed $2,000. However the amount you pay and who you pay it to may become a bit of a moving target. We mentioned earlier that you will now have the opportunity to spread your payments over the calendar year – or the remainder of it, if you sign up late or incur costs late in the year. The Medicare Prescription Payment Plan (M3P) takes your share of drug costs, up to a maximum of $2,000, and spreads them over the remainder of the year.
The simple example is for those on specialty pharmaceutical drugs like Nubeqa or Aubagio. Since your share of the drug cost is almost certainly going to be greater than $2,000 in January, if you opt in for M3P BEFORE going to the pharmacy or ordering from your mail order pharmacy, you’ll pay nothing on picking up/shipping the drugs. Subsequently, you’ll get a separate bill from your Payer for $167.67 monthly over 12 months, and pay no more for any of your drugs the rest of the year. There is NO interest, no late fee penalties, and you get a couple of months leeway, but there are penalties if you never pay. You can sign up for MP3 with your Medicare Payer/Plan Holder BUT not in the pharmacy for 2025. So if you arrive at the drug store prior to enrollment, you’ll be charged $2,000 to take your pills home. You can leave the pills, go home, enroll and return to the pharmacy 24 hours later and pick up without payment to the pharmacy..
If you don’t start this expensive drug until mid year, say September, and you’ve spent nothing on drugs prior, then the $2,000 is billed over the last 4 months at $500/month.
But what if your drug costs are more lumpy – they go up and down the whole year. In that case, the payments get recalculated each month and the monthly bill will vary.
There is a strange case too, if you know your co-pay is the same each month – say $55. This really throws M3P, and as you can see to the left, you’ll pay the same $660 (12x $55) either way but in different amounts each month if enrolled in M3P.
Finally, let’s address the Drug Benefit plans that many of you enjoy through PAN, PAF and others. Even the drug discount cards from Pharma that some receive. Whatever you receive, or however you receive it, does NOT reduce your $2,000 exposure. You advise the pharmacy that you have a benefit, and they bill the Benefit Provider (PAN, PAF, Pharma ??). The credit will be applied against your drug cost, although eventually you may still be liable for up to $2,000 co-pay when the benefit runs out.
Looking at the first slide, it seems to AnCan that these benefits that are often funded by Pharma, eventually flow back to Pharma and the Payer. How they will credit them against what the patient owes is not yet clear. Before you get too crazed, our guess is the system has to change. These benefits need to be channeled directly to patients who cannot afford $2,000 p.a. AnCan is on it and already reaching out to NAMAPA and others to promote more of a direct, income based subsidy possibly reaching more beneficiaries. One thing we have heard – APPLY EARLY for 2025 in the event you are in line to receive a subsidy.
PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN UP FOR THE M3P PROGRAM UPFRONT. EVEN IF YOU OWE $2,000 IT WILL BE BILLED IN 12 INSTALLMENTS. WE STILLL HAVE TO FIGURE HOW YOU WILL BE REIMBURSED IF YOU RECEIVE ASSISTANCE.
IF YOU HAVE A GRANT BE SURE TO PROVIDE DETALS TO THE PHARMACY ASAP. NOTWITHSTANDING, ALSO REACH OUT TO YOUR GRANTOR TO FIND HOW THEY WANT TO COORDINATE THE GRANT. IT’S STILLL A MOVING TARGET!
For men facing cancer treatment, the risk of infertility is a major concern that is often overlooked. While fertility preservation options exist, studies consistently show that a significant proportion of patients are not adequately informed or offered these choices by their healthcare providers before undergoing potentially sterilizing cancer treatments.
The main barriers to men being aware of fertility preservation include limited knowledge and training among providers, discomfort discussing the sensitive topic, low referral rates to reproductive specialists, logistical challenges, time constraints before treatment initiation, perceptions about appropriateness based on prognosis, and patient-related factors like lack of awareness and financial concerns.
It is crucial for men to understand their options for preserving fertility, which include:
Sperm Cryopreservation (Sperm Banking)
This standard and most effective method involves collecting and freezing sperm samples before treatment for future use through assisted reproductive techniques like intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). It is well-established and successful for post-pubertal males.
Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation
An experimental approach where testicular tissue is removed and frozen before cancer treatment. The frozen tissue may potentially be used later to extract sperm stem cells for reimplantation or to induce in vitro spermatogenesis. However, no live births from this method have been reported in humans yet.
Gonadal Shielding
Protecting the testicles from radiation damage by using lead shields during radiotherapy. Its effectiveness is limited by patient anatomy and radiation field requirements.
Sperm Retrieval
For males who cannot produce a semen sample, sperm can be surgically retrieved from the testicles or epididymis through techniques like testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA). Retrieved sperm can then be used for IVF/ICSI. This invasive option is appropriate when a male cannot produce a semen sample due to conditions like anejaculation, obstructive azoospermia, or prior to puberty.
While sperm cryopreservation is the most established and successful fertility preservation method, sperm retrieval combined with IVF/ICSI can be an option when cryopreserved sperm is unavailable or inadequate. However, IVF/ICSI is more invasive, costly, and has lower success rates compared to using cryopreserved sperm for insemination.
Overcoming barriers to awareness and utilization of fertility preservation options requires improved education and adherence to clinical guidelines from organizations like the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Establishing formal fertility preservation programs with multidisciplinary teams, patient navigators, and educational initiatives can help ensure that men with cancer have the opportunity to make informed decisions about preserving their fertility before undergoing cancer treatments.
For questions, please contact Mark Perloe at mperloe@outlook.com
Are you ready to get the inside scoop on clinical trials? Get ready to delve deep with former clinical trial nurse coordinator Marni Tierno. We know it can be a complex and overwhelming topic, but don’t worry – we’re here to break it down in a way that’s easy to understand.
Also featuring the vast professional experience of Wendy Garvin Mayo, we’ll tackle the myths and misconceptions that often surround clinical trials, giving you the facts and insights you need to make informed decisions.
Whether you’re a patient, carepartner, or simply curious about clinical trials, this webinar is for you! Our aim is to empower you with a deep understanding, allowing you to make the best choices for yourself or your loved ones.
Some of the topics we will cover include:
Description of the types and phases of clinical trials
Examples of pivotal clinical trials that have changed how we treat cancer
What to expect when participating in a clinical trial (including potential risks and benefits)
Addressing common questions about clinical trial participation
and more!
Watch here: (closed captioning is provided for this webinar, click the CC button at the bottom next to the gear.)
To view the slides from this webinar, please click here.
Special thanks to Bayer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Foundation Medicine, Myriad Genetics, Telix, and Blue Earth Diagnostics for sponsoring this webinar.
And very special thanks to Illumina and Collaborative Cancer Care for letting us have two of their absolute best people present for us!
.
To SIGN UP for any of our Virtual Support groups, visit our Contact Us page.
Helpful Tips to be Your Own Best Medical Researcher
AnCan asked Mike Wyn, a valued AnCan Frequent Flyer and intrepid researcher, to provide a little navigation to those who are new to research… as well as useful tips for some old hands like myself. I’ve already gathered some research nuggets from Mike’s wisdom… thank you, Mr. W.
Here are a few tips ensure the medical information you are researching is reliable and accurate
Book Research
Check the publication date: authors may need at least a year to write a book, and the average time between a book’s acceptance and its publication is typically between 9 to 12 months. Hence, the data may already be outdated when it hits the shelves
Professional Presentations
Check the credentials, disclaimers, and disclosures of the presenters. Who is the author? What is the sponsoring organization providing the information? Preferred sources are from reputable institutions, such as universities, hospitals, or government health agencies.
Google Web Searches
Use command “site:” to limit you search to top-level domains like .gov, ,org and ,edu. For example, type: latest NCCN guidelines for prostate active surveillance site: .gov OR site: .org OR site: .edu
Be cautious with .com sites unless they are from recognized and credible entities. Medical databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar are good sources for cross-referencing scientific research.
Articles, Online Posts
Check articles, online posts, videos etc. for their sources, including scientific studies, medical journals, or clinical trials. Information from peer-reviewed journals is typically more reliable than content from non-peer-reviewed sources. Poor reviewed means that other people similarly qualified to the author have reviewed teh article adn provided comments.
Anecdotal Evidence
Anecdotal evidence is information that has been observed by the person reporting but not verified. Be skeptical of anecdotal evidence such as personal stories. It is not scientifically reliable. Focus on information supported by scientific evidence and clinical studies. The quality levels of evidence from highest to lowest for medical data are:
Systematic reviews: collect and evaluate all available data/evidence within the researchers’ criteria. An example is the “Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews”. Meta studies are a systematic review.
Randomized controlled trials: participants are randomly assigned to experimental and control arms. The double-blind trial is the gold-standard of medical research where neither the participants nor the researchers know the placebo or medication/treatment is given. This is to prevent bias and to ensure the validity and reliability of the study.
Cohort observational study: participants with common traits or exposure to the proposed medications or treatments are followed over a long period of time.
Case study or report: a detailed report of result after treatment of an individual. This is formalized and reviewed anecdotal evidence.
Medical Trial Reports
The phases of medical trial studies cited by published medical papers are:
Pre-clinical studies: laboratory experiments using cell cultures, animal or computer models. In vitro means tested In Vitro – literally ‘in glass’ means testing outside a living organism, in a test tube or petri dish, In Vivo – literally in life -means testing in a living organism, often mice. Then studies move on to humans…
Phase I trials: assess safety, dosage and side effects of the proposed medications or treatment.
Phase II trials: expand P 1 to evaluate efficacy of the proposed medications or treatment – how well it works..
Phase III trials: confirm efficacy, safety, dosage and to evaluate side effects of the proposed medications or treatment in much larger samples. This is often where randomized blind and double blind design is used. Blind means the patient does not know what they are getting; double blind means neither the patient nor the clinician know what is being dosed.
Phase IV trials: monitor long term effectiveness and safety of the medication or treatment.
Statistical Terms
Some terms regarding statistical data cited in medical journals are explained as follows:
N = the number of participants: be wary of studies with a very low N.
HR = hazard ratio: HR=1 – there is no change in the proposed medication/treatment compared to control baseline. HR<1 – there is a reduction of risks with the proposed medication/treatment. HR>1 – there is an increase risk with the proposed medication/treatment.
CI = Confidence Interval: A trial shows that a particular drug has a 20% effect within a certain time frame with 95% CI. This shows that the study, if repeated many times, it will be 95% confident that the 20% reduction will be consistently observed.
P-value = Probability Value: This measures how strong the evidence is that the hypothesis, or effect being tested, is correct, rather than the result being random, or incorrect (null hypothesis). We seek a P-value that is <=0.05 meaning that there is a 95% or better likelihood the result is attributable to what is being tested..
We are so excited to announce our Renal Medullary Carcinoma Support Group partners are on an esteemed panel for World Sickle Cell Day representing RMC! This events features Ritchie Johnson of Chris ‘CJ’ Johnson Foundation (US) and Nicola Casey of The Ricky Casey Trust (UK) and several other international perspectives on Sickle Cell Trait/Disease. Every time SCT and RMC are discussed together, progress is made in our community. We are so glad these incredible ladies are talking about it! We encourage you to attend this event and learn more.
and this is a part of the plan. As you can see in the slide to the left comparing 2024 to 2025, the donut hole has been eliminated. In its place, the Payer (Plan Sponsor) and Pharma (manufacturer) are paying more. While the cost saving is very positive, it will likely impact us patients in other ways:
But what if your drug costs are more lumpy – they go up and down the whole year. In that case, the payments get recalculated each month and the monthly bill will vary.
. 
